Table 25 The effect of artificial diet and sugar syrup on comb area, honey stores, pollen stores, egg number and male brood under coconut
Parameters recorded: | Comb area | Honey | Pollen | Eggs | Male |
sq. in. | cells | cells | brood | ||
Treatments: | |||||
SYRUP + ARTIFICIAL DIET: | 112a | 3164a | 344ab | 1591a | 373a |
SYRUP: | 129a | 3238a | 513a | 3584a | 75a |
ARTIFICIAL DIET: | 54b | 199b | 203ab | 1210a | 85a |
CONTROL: | 56b | 1b | 129b | 1961a | 46a |
Different letters in the same column denote significant differences between treatments (DMRT at P=0.10).
This food combination significantly exceeded the syrup alone treatment in three respects: honey content, pollen content and egg number in the hives. Honey content merely shows that the syrup was being transferred from the syrup container into the honeycomb and the high amount of pollen present showed that bees used the syrup energy to collect the maize pollen in the surrounding area compared to when given syrup without a pollen source.
However the significantly higher number of eggs laid by the queen when both syrup and pollen were present compared to when only syrup was given, showed that pollen may be acting as an extra incentive for egg-laying.
The results also show that the area chosen for the control treatment was indeed poor in food and it paints a true picture of beekeeping away from the coconut growing regions of the country especially during a rainy spell.
No comments:
Post a Comment